Dear Editor,

I agree with Mr. Smith [] It鈥檚 sad and negligent that the city allows 鈥渕ammoth apartment-size housing鈥� to loom over his home.

The city planning department and elected officials look less than professional when allowing properties to develop this way.

Residential homes that are similar in size share a good neighbour feel that is inclusive. It is the norm when a new subdivision is developed, as it provides curb appeal and a welcoming look.

Unfortunately, what is happening now in the majority of cases, when a property is subdivided later in an 鈥渆stablished neighbourhood,鈥� this consideration or requirement is neglected.

A remedy: approve new buildings in an existing neighbourhood that are a reasonable percentage larger than what is already established. Neighbourhoods do change, but it can be accomplished in a harmonious way.

Unfortunately, investors, developers, and the city all play a part, lacking consideration and due diligence when permit approval and design are a poor fit for surrounding home owners.

Apartment-sized houses can also cause a burden on hospitals, police, schools, and other important services that base their resources on the official community plan.

The city designation may read 鈥渟ingle family,鈥� but this is misleading, as I have experienced homes this size will have suites or rooms rented exceeding the bylaws. This is a detriment in the long run to the families living in that area as well as the community. We hear about delays or problems when services can鈥檛 keep up to demand.

A contributing factor is allowing developers to over build, and city planners who are out of touch.

Jim Lawson, 91原创

_________________________________

Do you have anything to add? Share your opinion.

Email:

Like us on or follow us on

_________________________________