It was a comment that caused a great deal of online commentary, for a single off-the-cuff remark.

At a recent Vancouver city council meeting, Vancouver Public Library staff were making a presentation. Newly elected Vancouver Mayor Ken Sim asked if they had looked at any ideas of generating revenue themselves.

The library reps, naturally, pointed out that provincial laws around libraries limit what services they can charge for, but also that, yes, libraries do raise money where they can 鈥� mostly from room rentals. They are also supported by the VPL Foundation, which raises millions.

(Sure would be nice if someone would start a fundraising foundation for the Fraser Valley Regional Library, the largest library system in B.C. Anyone who gets this project off the ground, call me. I鈥檒l kick in the first $50.)

But Sim鈥檚 remark sparked anger, because it showed, again, how tone deaf some politicians can be when it comes to libraries.

Should libraries charge for their services?

Of course not.

No mayor, no councillor in their right mind would ask any of the other big civic services if they鈥檝e considered 鈥済enerating revenue.鈥�

Would you ask the fire department if they would charge for 911 calls? Maybe $20 for giving CPR?

Libraries are a deeply unappreciated resource, often because there鈥檚 a failure of imagination by the civic leaders who oversee those programs.

Everyone can imagine having their house being on fire, or being in a car accident, so they can imagine needing the firefighters, and see why it would be bad if we charged for access to them.

But politicians often have difficulty with the idea that for some people 鈥� quite a lot of people, actually 鈥� regular access to books absolutely depends on public libraries.

Our leaders are usually reasonably well off, and if they want a book, they can just buy it. Also, some of them can鈥檛 imagine needing access to literally hundreds of books a year.

Have you ever seen a parent with a couple pre-school-aged kids, taking out their bi-weekly stack of picture books at the library? Those parents are tired enough. Take away their access to storytime books at your peril.

Not to mention students, seniors on a fixed income, working people with limited means, and the general avid readers who go through two or three books a week. For these people, the library is a necessity and a refuge.

Libraries are as close to a utopian institution as we鈥檝e ever invented, and frankly it鈥檚 a miracle they haven鈥檛 all been closed down in the service of saving 鈥渢he taxpayers鈥� a few bucks.

If you did close them, the parents of small children would probably burn you in effigy, with the help of the mystery, romance, and fantasy novel fanatics out there.

The question we should ask isn鈥檛 鈥淐an libraries make money?鈥� It鈥檚 鈥淗ow can we make other valuable institutions more like libraries?鈥�

READ ALSO: PAINFUL TRUTH: Family affects jobs and hiring

READ ALSO: PAINFUL TRUTH: The death of the backyard is coming soon