91原创

Skip to content

Football players feeling optimistic after SFU reinstatement case made in court

Judge has reserved injunction decision, football program alumni set to speak to university governors
32592389_web1_230502-CPW-SFU-football-court-case-court_1
Simon Fraser University football players and their supporters leave B.C. Supreme Court after attending a hearing, in Vancouver, on Monday, May 1, 2023. The lawyer representing players and alumni of Simon Fraser University脮s football team asked a judge to grant an injunction that would require the university to attempt to bring back the axed program. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Darryl Dyck

Players and supporters of the Simon Fraser University football team expressed optimism about the program鈥檚 return after a court hearing Monday.

The Burnaby, B.C. university announced the dissolution of the football team on April 4 of this year after their affiliation with a National Collegiate Athletics Association conference was ended.

Lawyer Peter Gall, representing the players, told the court on Monday that his clients are seeking: reinstatement as athletes, reinstating coaches to their former roles, take good faith steps to find a new conference for the team to play in, or find an alternative schedule for the team next season.

鈥淭here鈥檚 so much support not only from the existing team that wants to play next year but support from the community and across the country for the continuation of the program,鈥 Gall said after the hearing. 鈥淚 hope the university will really take to heart how committed the players, coaches and the community are for restoring this program.鈥

Gall said the university has shown 鈥渓ittle regard鈥 for the players and their well-being, adding their rights have 鈥渂een run roughshod over.鈥

Gideone Kremler, who played defensive back for the team, said the decision to cancel the program didn鈥檛 take the affect players and coaches into consideration.

鈥淲e as players and coaches haven鈥檛 been given a voice,鈥 he said.

Emily Kirkpatrick, the lawyer representing the university, refuted that statement saying there is no evidence to support that notion.

Kirkpatrick said the school took reasonable steps to inform the athletes and coaches of the program鈥檚 demise.

鈥淭here was a characterization of the evidence, there was plain overlooking of some of the evidence and in my submission, there was liberties taken with what that evidence actually says,鈥 she told the court.

The end, said Kirkpatrick, was brought about by the Lone Star Conference revoking the university鈥檚 programs citing the cost of travel and low competitive performance. The team went 1-9 last season and 1-7 in the 2021 season.

SFU joined the Lone Star Conference in 2021 for a two-year term and the budget allocated to running the team in the upcoming season would have been $950,000.

Kirkpatrick also argued that the university did not have a contract with players to continue the program and questioned how the university could restart the program.

But, Gall said, there is still a chance to save the football program.

鈥淚t鈥檚 not too late,鈥 he told the court. 鈥淭he players want to stay and play here. The coaches are still available and they can be reinstated. That鈥檚 not an insurmountable hurdle.鈥

Mark Bailey, the president of the football alumni society, said there鈥檚 an application to speak to the university鈥檚 governors on May 25 to speak about the issue.

Justice K. Michael Stephens reserved a decision on the injunction until a later date.

鈥擭ick Wells, The Canadian Press

READ MORE:





(or

91原创

) document.head.appendChild(flippScript); window.flippxp = window.flippxp || {run: []}; window.flippxp.run.push(function() { window.flippxp.registerSlot("#flipp-ux-slot-ssdaw212", "Black Press Media Standard", 1281409, [312035]); }); }