Editor: I have the privilege, and yet sometimes difficult task of raising a three -and-a-half-year-old and a 2-year-old.
If you’ve ever been a parent, you know that although there can be challenges, it is the most beautiful job in the entire world. I truly love being a mom.
Yet one challenge as a mom can be the area of discipline.
My children are energetic, curious, and strong-willed, and I’ve had to channel and mould these characteristics.
For example, we went through a period when my son would want to turn the dials on our gas stove — incredibly dangerous. So at a young age, I would flick his hand and say “no touch!”
After a few times, he learned and it has not been a problem again.
Another example is that my daughter loved to run away in parking lots — again, very dangerous.
I would have to grab her arm and put her unwillingly into the car for a time-out. Again, this method of discipline worked for her and it hasn’t been an issue since.
A Senator recently introduced Bill S-206 and it will, if passed, remove section 43 from the Criminal Code that allows parents to use limited, minor force while they are disciplining their children.
Therefore, if I was to flick my son’s hand, or physically restrain my daughter, I would be considered a criminal.
Yes, I would be charged with assault for lovingly disciplining my child and preventing a very dangerous outcome.
This is not just an “anti-spanking” law, it is a law that dis-empowers a parent’s freedom and responsibility to raise children safely.
Sue Schouten,
91ԭ