Now that the B.C. NDP-Green coalition has engineered the looting of the public treasury to replace union and corporate money for political parties, it is moving on to tilt the electoral system to favour its urban support base and prop up smaller parties.

That鈥檚 the essential strategy for the electoral reform referendum being pushed through by Premier John Horgan and Attorney General David Eby. It鈥檚 rigged, or as Eby calls it, 鈥渉ard wired鈥� to shift political power to cities and away from rural B.C., to the benefit of the urban coalition and its professional environmentalist allies.

鈥淧roportional representation鈥� is the core demand of B.C. Green leader Andrew Weaver, and it鈥檚 easy to see why. This change would double or even triple the number of Green seats, based on current voting patterns.

It is the one issue that could cause the three-member Greens to withdraw support from the NDP and trigger an election. 鈥淚t鈥檚 who we are,鈥� Weaver likes to say, and he鈥檚 right. The Greens are a fringe party aiming to join the establishment. And this, along with millions of taxpayer dollars, is how they mean to do it.

Weaver didn鈥檛 even want the public to have a say. In the intense, closed-door negotiations to support the NDP minority and topple the B.C. Liberals in July, he conceded to have the voting system put to a referendum. We now know the deal included the key condition that the referendum be decided by a simple majority of those who actually vote, regardless of region or turnout.

When this formula was revealed in early November, I asked Horgan if he is prepared to let Metro Vancouver decide to change the voting system for all. Half of B.C.鈥檚 population lives there, and it certainly makes campaigning easier when you can ignore most of a province that鈥檚 twice as big as Germany.

I have his , from Nov. 8. Horgan noted that whenever electoral boundaries are reviewed, preserving rural representation across a vast, thinly populated area is a strong demand.

鈥淚t鈥檚 fundamental to British Columbians, and I鈥檓 committed to make sure that happens,鈥� Horgan told me. This is the next promise I expect him to break, after that one before the May election where he said taxpayers wouldn鈥檛 have to finance political parties they don鈥檛 support.

How much of your money do they get? Based on current voting patterns, the NDP and Greens will split as much as $18 million over the five-year renewable term of their just-passed public subsidy law. The B.C. Liberals, if they accept it, would collect about $12 million from a system that starts paying in January at $2.50 per vote in the last election.

Other fringe parties can get on the gravy train. The B.C. Conservatives should revive, if they can refrain from knifing their latest leader and burning their own house down, as is their recent style. Communists could win a seat in the B.C. legislature, perhaps joined by one of those hard-right anti-immigration parties that are flourishing in Europe.

This of course threatens the life of B.C.鈥檚 long-running governing coalition, the one that used to call itself Social Credit and now goes by the name B.C. Liberals. Killing that is another goal of the NDP-Greens.

We don鈥檛 even know yet what the multiple referendum questions will be. Eby is 鈥渃onsulting鈥� on that and then will be the 鈥渘eutral arbiter,鈥� or so he says.

There must be a yes-no question on whether to change the voting system at all. I鈥檒l be voting no.

Tom Fletcher is B.C. legislature reporter and columnist for Black Press. Email: tfletcher@blackpress.ca