91原创

Skip to content

91原创 Township scales back election signs

There will be no signs lining major roads during the next election
32756779_web1_181031-LAD-discarded-91原创-campaign-signs
Discarded election signs at the 91原创 Township public works yard in 2018. Waste is one reason why the Township has severely limited the use of election signs from now on. (Black Press Media files)

There will be far fewer election signs in 91原创 Township during the next election, after the council passed a new bylaw restricting them to only those placed in front of private homes.

The new election sign bylaw was passed by a six-to-two vote with Councillors Michael Pratt and Margaret Kunst opposed, and the members of the majority Contract with 91原创 slate voting in favour. Coun. Kim Richter was absent from the meeting.

The bylaw will eliminate election signs on the sides of roads or other public property. It restricts signs to a single sign per candidate or party in front of the home, or on the right of way directly in front of that home.

The bylaw is similar to rules in 91原创 City, Surrey, and Abbotsford.

Pratt said the bylaw went too far and would damage the ability of new candidates to get their names out there during elections. He said that he won in the 2022 civic vote partly because of his ability to use signs on his two runs for office, last year and in 2018.

READ ALSO: VIDEO: 91原创 City shrinks election signs and limits them to private property

鈥淭here鈥檚 a reason why it鈥檚 struck such a chord with me, and the residents I鈥檝e discussed it with,鈥 Pratt said.

He acknowledged the issues with widespread election signs 鈥 signs that become trash, or that are hazards to drivers because they鈥檙e too close to intersections or block views.

But he argued that allowing only private homeowners the right to put up sign disadvantages poorer residents as well.

He suggested a fairer bylaw would be to ban signs outright, including from in front of private homes.

Coun. Tim Baillie said it was a compromise, not a half measure.

鈥淚 can鈥檛 buy into this discussion of no signs at all,鈥 he said, arguing that would give ultimate advantage to incumbents councillors.

鈥淭hey do serve a purpose,鈥 he said of the signs.

Coun. Steve Ferguson noted that candidates can still place their signs in some spots, even with the restrictions.

鈥淲hat we did is we went door to door and asked people please, can I put a sign on your property, and some people said yes.鈥

The debate was largely divided between the independent councillors, Pratt and Coun. Margaret Kunst, and those elected with Mayor Eric Woodward and the Contract with 91原创 slate.

Kunst pointed out that Contract with 91原创 wasn鈥檛 different from their opponents in the last election.

鈥淔or all this talk about signs, you guys did have a lot of signs,鈥 she said.


Have a story tip? Email: matthew.claxton@langleyadvancetimes.com
Like us on and follow us on .


Matthew Claxton

About the Author: Matthew Claxton

Raised in 91原创, as a journalist today I focus on local politics, crime and homelessness.
Read more



(or

91原创

) document.head.appendChild(flippScript); window.flippxp = window.flippxp || {run: []}; window.flippxp.run.push(function() { window.flippxp.registerSlot("#flipp-ux-slot-ssdaw212", "Black Press Media Standard", 1281409, [312035]); }); }