The City of 91原创 may be the next Lower Mainland municipality to dive into the shark fin debate.

On July 9, night, Councillor Rosemary Wallace made a motion to ban the possession, trade, sale or distribution of shark fins in the City unless it is for bona fide educational purposes.

Asked whether she knew of any place in the City where shark fin is sold or served, Wallace replied that she鈥檇 heard, anecdotally, that there is one business that trades in the Asian delicacy, although she was unsure whether it is in the City or the Township.

However, she said, that shouldn鈥檛 stop the City from taking a stand on the issue.

鈥淭his should be a global responsibility, even if there is only one place in 91原创,鈥� said Wallace.

鈥淚 agree with the intention of the bylaw,鈥� said Councillor Gayle Martin.

鈥淏ut how do you enforce it? And what鈥檚 the penalty, a slap on the wrist?鈥�

鈥淚s this a big problem in 91原创 and what are we going to do about it if we enact a bylaw?

鈥淚 don鈥檛 even know where you get it. Is it on the menu or (sold) under the table?鈥� wondered Martin.

If adopted, the rule could become part of the City鈥檚 building licensing bylaw, said CAO Francis Cheung.

鈥淲e can remove their business licence if we find they are serving shark fin.鈥�

鈥淚鈥檓 a little concerned there might be a cultural bias we鈥檙e not being informed of,鈥� said Councillor Dave Hall.

鈥淲e鈥檝e seen one side of the argument.鈥�

It would be 鈥渘o small feat鈥� for staff to find out how big a problem the sale of shark fins is in 91原创, said Mayor Peter Fassbender, who suggested the item be tabled while the City checked with other communities.

The sale of shark fin products has reportedly already been banned in Port Moody and Coquitlam and on Monday night, Richmond City Council debated a similar bylaw.

The reason finning happens is that it is much more profitable to harvest only the fins of the sharks which take up less space on a fishing vessel.

According to the Humane Society, the act of finning means that rather than kill the animal, its fins are sliced off and the living shark is dumped back into the water to either bleed to death or possibly become prey for other sharks.

From an ecological viewpoint, it means that many more sharks are killed each year than would be if fishermen were required to return to port with entire sharks before removing their fins. As a result, says the Humane Society, sharks are being fished in unsustainable volumes.

The motion was tabled while City staff gather more information.