Alberta鈥檚 premier fired the starter鈥檚 pistol Thursday for a provincewide consultation on whether to quit the Canada Pension Plan while releasing a report that estimates the province deserves more than half CPP鈥檚 assets.

The third-party report says Alberta should get $334 billion, or 53 per cent of the national retirement savings program, if it leaves in 2027 following the required three-year notification period.

Danielle Smith says the report found Albertans could save up to $5 billion in the first year of an Alberta Pension Plan.

Such a withdrawal could lead to 鈥渜uite modest鈥� contribution hikes in other provinces, the premier said, but the goal is to help Albertans and to tell Ottawa to stop taking for granted Alberta鈥檚 outsized contribution to the national purse.

鈥淲e want to have a better, constructive relationship with the rest of the country, and this begins the conversation,鈥� Smith said in Calgary.

鈥淚 would hope people would develop an understanding of how difficult it is when you鈥檝e got a small-population province like Alberta being asked to subsidize the rest of the country, as we do on so many programs.

鈥淢any of these federal programs are stacked against us, and this one, I think, shows how dramatically stacked against Albertans it is.鈥�

Smith said she personally favours a provincially run nest-egg fund and promised legislation this fall that 鈥渄erisks鈥� it.

鈥淵our pension is safe. It will be the same or higher. Your premiums will be the same or lower,鈥� said Smith.

Federal Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland declined to comment until she is briefed on Alberta鈥檚 proposal, but she called the CPP a 鈥渃rown jewel鈥� envied around the world.

鈥淭he CPP ensures that our parents and all of us can have a safe and dignified retirement,鈥� said Freeland.

Alberta Opposition NDP Leader Rachel Notley said Smith鈥檚 United Conservative Party government wants its hands on Albertans鈥� pensions.

鈥淒anielle Smith took the first step in her long-term plan to steal your pension,鈥� Notley said.

鈥淪he did it by releasing a report riddled with fake numbers. And she now plans to spend your money campaigning to convince you it鈥檚 a good idea.

鈥淚f they can extract that much money from the Canada Pension Plan, they will kill it all across the country, not just here.鈥�

If Alberta leaves, it would be the first province to quit the CPP. All provinces and territories are part of it except Quebec, which didn鈥檛 join after it was set up in 1965.

The report, compiled by pension analyst firm Lifeworks, notes its 53 per cent calculation is 鈥渟ignificantly higher than Alberta鈥檚 representative population in the CPP, which is about 15 per cent.鈥�

鈥�(But) due to Alberta鈥檚 younger population, higher pensionable earnings, and higher employment rates, contributions by Albertans to the CPP have historically exceeded the benefits paid to Albertans.鈥�

The CPP funding rules were overhauled in 1997 and again in 2016, likely leading to questions over how best to piece together who put in what and who deserves how much.

Michel Leduc, head of public affairs with the CPP Investment Board, said it respects the right of any province that wants to leave but 鈥渃an鈥檛 find any legal or actuarial reasons鈥� that support the report鈥檚 $334 billion figure.

鈥淲e believe that the framework would see a claim that is much closer to what Alberta has contributed to the Canada Pension Plan since inception, and that鈥檚 not 53 per cent. That鈥檚 closer to 16 per cent.鈥�

University of Calgary economist Trevor Tombe said the Lifeworks model is based on a hypothetical payout tied to one interpretation of the funding formula. He said his calculations come in at 20 to 25 per cent of the total CPP pool due Alberta.

The report鈥檚 promise of big benefits and lower contributions hinges on getting that $334 billion, Tombe said, but it isn鈥檛 realistic.

If its formula is applied to Alberta and Ontario, those two provinces would be entitled to 113 per cent of the funds.

The report estimates the price of setting up the Alberta plan to be between $100 million and $1 billion, depending on how much the province piggybacks on the CPP mechanisms.

The cost of implementing the investment arm of the Alberta plan would be another $75 million to $1.2 billion, again depending on how much the province taps into existing structures and expertise.

The future, says the report, suggests short-term windfalls tapering off as Alberta鈥檚 population ages and reverts closer to the national mean.

The province would have to change legislation, amend employment laws that touch on the CPP and negotiate pension agreements for Albertans working elsewhere.

It would have to decide who runs the Alberta plan and what its goals would be: strict return on investment or, as in Quebec, whether investment managers would also consider investments that contribute to provincial economic development.

And then there is Alberta鈥檚 roller-coaster economy and its comparatively small population of 4.4 million.

For decades, the only constant in Alberta has been wide swings in budgets, with years of eye-popping multibillion-dollar surpluses, punctuated by years of staggering multibillion-dollar deficits, all linked to the vicissitudes of oil and gas prices.

Alberta has emerged in recent years from a deep trough of red ink back into big-ticket surpluses, and the report acknowledges the future is tough to predict.

A government pension panel led by former provincial finance minister Jim Dinning is to hold information sessions and solicit feedback through the spring.

The panel would then deliver a report about whether it believes Albertans want the issue put to a vote.

If so, Smith said there would be a referendum and a majority of Albertans would have to give the OK.

The report has been promised for years by the UCP government. Its Fair Deal panel toured the province and in 2020 recommended pursuing its own pension plan.

A poll that accompanied the Fair Deal panel report, and public surveys since, indicate a majority of Albertans want to stay with the CPP.

READ ALSO: